Ruggedised devices or phones? It’s your choice


So if you want to use a system like Truckcom, should you use ruggedised, industrial devices or the cheaper “phone” grade devices?
The best answer we can come up with is this: Use whichever you’re most comfortable with. Truckcom is fully compatible with both kinds of device; so really the choice of which sort to use (and therefore how much you spend on devices) is very much a financial decision for you – after all, they will be your devices.
Ruggedised devices represent a larger investment (they are substantially more expensive than smartphones) but can be expected to last longer. There are rumours of ruggedised devices in service with some of the parcel carriers which have lasted 8 or 9 years. Smartphones almost certainly won’t last that long, but can be expected to last about 3 years. Often if phone devices have been provided to you by one of the networks as part of a contract with them, they’ll expect to replace them at that stage anyway.
Among our customers to date, economy seems to be the main factor governing which devices they use, and smartphones are a firm favourite. Given the price differential with ruggedised devices, you’d need to lose or break several smartphones before your out of pocket compared with ruggedised device costs, and in practice the smartphone devices do the job just fine at a far lower cost. But I have to come back to the previous answer as the bottom line – this is a customer choice, and we recommend you use whichever style of device you’re most comfortable with.
A final factor in device choice is the exact use you intend it for. Some operators need to be able to scan barcodes out on the road. If you need this, you will need a ruggedised style device, because none of the smartphone grade devices include barcode readers.
What’s your experience in use of different kinds of devices in practice? We’re interested in your comments.

